I had a disturbing dream. It was President Obama addressing the State of the Union... "Today I have signed a Bill that will save the planet. It doesn’t matter whether or not you are among the 27% according to The Alex Jones Report that think this action is part of a conspiracy involving an Elitist Cult with a mission to discover the most efficient way to enslave the world for the longest period of time possible. For those of you who are among this demographic, I ask you to take this into consideration: no information is not published on purpose. Every piece you receive through the “internet” is available to you only because someone wants you to see it. This kind of Infoterrorism, these Conspiracy Theories were part of the cause supporting another Bill I signed today to secure the flow of information and to ensure that the American People are never again subjected to such preposterous anti-americanism.
The bottom line is that all of you are addicted to energy. Addicted to consumption. It stops now.
You might notice an increase in your electrical bills. One solution: spend a little less time at the computer engaging in the falsely educational bombardment of fabricated misinformation. Change your light bulbs to CFL; it'll curb the cost. Times are going to be rough for a while; you must never forget that when you curb your consumption, you're honoring and serving yourself, your family, your nation, and the world. Should you become ill, you will be cared for. No American will have to go hungry. The emerging Agricultural Reform will put in place a Federal Commitment to developing food production facilities so efficient that one day no one in the world will have to go hungry.
I got a great deal that will completely obliterate the economic crisis. For every ton of greenhouse gases we decrease over the next two years, the Green Enterprise initiatives will remove a good amount of money from the deficit. Now it's going to take some time to obtain the financial security this nation deserves. Many of you are out of work, and that's OK. It just means that you'll be consuming a little less, which is great because it will help us to reach our goal to clear the entire national debt. Jobs will inevitably become available. There is plenty of work to be done. With the ever-increasing financial burden of Greenhouse Gases, businesses are going to want to figure out a way to use less. A cleaner more profitably industrial America will flourish with limitless bounds because of the steps we the people take today.
The Illusion of Free Enterprise will be maintained, and it has always been an illusion, through an exchange system just like we have now. Investors can avoid the burden of Carbon Tax Penalties by contributing to the betterment of the earth through investing in, and sustaining one indivisible nation and Green Enterprise. Green investments will strengthen the foundation of our Country and encourage the emergence of a new industry of commercial Green Investment Banking Facilities that can compete to serve the public and provide a profit, but America reserves the right to audit these facilities and take full control before they become so powerful that they manipulate our market and dilute our legislature to protect their foreign agenda."
Friday, November 13, 2009
Thursday, November 12, 2009
New World Currency, New World Order
Some findings on One World Government controlling everything.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) took form almost 20 years ago. Since then, 192 countries have ratified (US ratified 10/15/1992). Under the Convention, governments gather and share information about Greenhouse Gas emissions and practices and provide financial and technological support to developing countries. More recently, many nations have approved the addition of the Kyoto Protocol (KP, February 2005). The KP has more powerful and binding measures.
“The major distinction between the Protocol and the Convention is that while the Convention encouraged industrialised countries to stabilize GHG emissions, the Protocol commits them to do so.”
The Kyoto mechanisms
Under the Treaty, countries must meet their targets primarily through national measures. However, the Kyoto Protocol offers them an additional means of meeting their targets by way of three market-based mechanisms.
Emissions Market (Carbon Trading)
Clean Development Mechanism
Joint Implementation
The Carbon Trading mechanism is sitting in the hands of the Senate now as HR 2454 “American Clean Energy and Security Act 2009” under Subtitle B.
Clean Development Mechanism offers “carbon credits” (think cash back) for any Annex B party (developed country with “carbon-emission reduction commitments”). If, say, the US wants to contribute to developing more renewable energy platforms in a “developing” country, the US can get some Carbon Credits back. These credits can be counted towards their Kyoto goals. So, a shit-spewing developed country doesn’t necessarily have to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as long as they fund enough developing countries to obtain enough “credits” that will put the shit-spewing country where they need to be according to their Kyoto Protocol requirements.
The Joint Implementation mechanism further allows shit-spewing nations to avoid reducing emissions by means of Emission Reduction Credits earned by other shit-spewing countries. This allows developed nations with emission reduction commitments to purchase/trade the earned credits of another developed nation. These credits also can be used to fulfill Kyoto Protocol requirements.
Looks like the creation of a new global currency and international trade opportunity. Global Environmental Facility (GEF) terms it as another “resource allocation system”, like the World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA) and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
The genius of this financial system is that the new currency is virtually limitless – there is no scarcity of CO2, only the imposed limitations set forth by the Conference of Parties under this Convention.
The course of action has been in place for many years and is scheduled to reach an agreement on the implementation of this new order with the signing of a treaty during COP15 sessions of the UNFCCC in Denmark. The United Nations bodies, specialized agencies and related organizations (such as WMO, UNEP, IPCC, the World Bank, GEF) are allowed to observe the proceedings.
Those who control this financial system directly control/limit the growth of every nation in existence.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) took form almost 20 years ago. Since then, 192 countries have ratified (US ratified 10/15/1992). Under the Convention, governments gather and share information about Greenhouse Gas emissions and practices and provide financial and technological support to developing countries. More recently, many nations have approved the addition of the Kyoto Protocol (KP, February 2005). The KP has more powerful and binding measures.
“The major distinction between the Protocol and the Convention is that while the Convention encouraged industrialised countries to stabilize GHG emissions, the Protocol commits them to do so.”
The Kyoto mechanisms
Under the Treaty, countries must meet their targets primarily through national measures. However, the Kyoto Protocol offers them an additional means of meeting their targets by way of three market-based mechanisms.
Emissions Market (Carbon Trading)
Clean Development Mechanism
Joint Implementation
The Carbon Trading mechanism is sitting in the hands of the Senate now as HR 2454 “American Clean Energy and Security Act 2009” under Subtitle B.
Clean Development Mechanism offers “carbon credits” (think cash back) for any Annex B party (developed country with “carbon-emission reduction commitments”). If, say, the US wants to contribute to developing more renewable energy platforms in a “developing” country, the US can get some Carbon Credits back. These credits can be counted towards their Kyoto goals. So, a shit-spewing developed country doesn’t necessarily have to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as long as they fund enough developing countries to obtain enough “credits” that will put the shit-spewing country where they need to be according to their Kyoto Protocol requirements.
The Joint Implementation mechanism further allows shit-spewing nations to avoid reducing emissions by means of Emission Reduction Credits earned by other shit-spewing countries. This allows developed nations with emission reduction commitments to purchase/trade the earned credits of another developed nation. These credits also can be used to fulfill Kyoto Protocol requirements.
Looks like the creation of a new global currency and international trade opportunity. Global Environmental Facility (GEF) terms it as another “resource allocation system”, like the World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA) and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
The genius of this financial system is that the new currency is virtually limitless – there is no scarcity of CO2, only the imposed limitations set forth by the Conference of Parties under this Convention.
The course of action has been in place for many years and is scheduled to reach an agreement on the implementation of this new order with the signing of a treaty during COP15 sessions of the UNFCCC in Denmark. The United Nations bodies, specialized agencies and related organizations (such as WMO, UNEP, IPCC, the World Bank, GEF) are allowed to observe the proceedings.
Those who control this financial system directly control/limit the growth of every nation in existence.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (bill HR 875)
In a week and a half, the US House and Senate will be voting on a new bill, the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (bill HR 875). This bill essentially outlaws organic farming. It will tell farmers exactly what seeds to use, what chemicals to use, etc. If farmers do not comply they will be fined a hefty sum. Backing the bill is everyone's favorite genetically modified organism agricultural mogul, Monsanto. If you want to protect your right to CHOOSE what you put on your plates, if you want to protect farmers' rights to grow what they believe is healthy, if you want to protect the world from putting the food chain in jeopardy, and global effects caused by transgenic organisms-contact your local senators and tell them your vote is a firm NO! Without hearing your voice, the bill will be passed unnoticed!
Go here to tell you senator.
Go here to tell you senator.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
"Conspiracy Theorists"
Have you ever noticed that the second someone publicly discredits the government using their rights of free speech, they are automatically labeled as a conspiracy theorist? Whatever happened to the terms "philosopher" or "free thinker" to denote someone who ponders existence, the government, and how to improve upon it. We are no longer allowed to think freely and then share with others. If we do, we are labeled with negative terms that are usually associated with psychological disorders such as schizophrenia. You don't think that the government has your best interests at heart? You MUST be crazy!
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Why is the FCC so interested in my Pool Light?
I recently purchased a floating pool light for some nighttime swimming fun. As I put my three AA batteries in, I noticed a sticker stating the following:
“This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.”
I had no idea this tiny plastic globe with mini colored light bulbs would initiate FCC concern to the level of requiring a written statement of compliance.
The global RF feed is so important to Congress that the most insignificant electronics must be regulated to ensure the feed is not interfered with? What data is being transmitted that is so sensitive that my pool light needs to be tested and approved? I find it hard to believe that Congress is legitimately concerned that my pool light might annoy my next-door neighbor by causing a fuzzy season finale of The Biggest Loser.
What data is truly being transmitted through his V-Chip while he watches? Whatever it is, it must be really important.
“This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.”
I had no idea this tiny plastic globe with mini colored light bulbs would initiate FCC concern to the level of requiring a written statement of compliance.
The global RF feed is so important to Congress that the most insignificant electronics must be regulated to ensure the feed is not interfered with? What data is being transmitted that is so sensitive that my pool light needs to be tested and approved? I find it hard to believe that Congress is legitimately concerned that my pool light might annoy my next-door neighbor by causing a fuzzy season finale of The Biggest Loser.
What data is truly being transmitted through his V-Chip while he watches? Whatever it is, it must be really important.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
The Consumer Genome Project
The ubiquitous passive RFID tags need to be within range of the electromagnetic field generated by the RFID reader in order to upload data to the massive consumer genome project that is currently underway. This creates NO obstacle for tracking the movement, purchase history, information trafficking, and location every consumer - as well as predicting their future actions, movement, and information trafficking based on associations with linked social networking data - since television broadcast has a solid foundation of radio frequencies reaching out into every home. Unfortunately, this broadcast system would interfere greatly with the ultimate purpose of constantly exposing every one of the earth’s inhabitants to this harmful energy – to initiate the total dissolve of the individual to assure an unnoticed transition into complete control over every being / resource.
An all-too-easy way to avoid television broadcast interference would be to force the transition to Digital Television signals, freeing up much of the frequency spectrum while maintaining the infrastructure that forces these signals into everyone’s home. The US Government apparently enjoyed this idea and decided to fund the operation. Did you receive your $40 government coupon for a “DTV converter box”?
An all-too-easy way to avoid television broadcast interference would be to force the transition to Digital Television signals, freeing up much of the frequency spectrum while maintaining the infrastructure that forces these signals into everyone’s home. The US Government apparently enjoyed this idea and decided to fund the operation. Did you receive your $40 government coupon for a “DTV converter box”?
Not Microwavable
Think “going cash” is going to protect you from the invasive technologies at hand? Think again. Once everyone carries their National ID chip (in their passport, license, or arm flesh), the embedded RFID tags in their cash will link directly to their personal ID through proximity. You can try lining your wallet with aluminum foil as an attempt to block the system, but as technology advances, this tactic will not work.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Are there any health risks associated with RFID and radio waves?
The answer is a firm YES.
RFID Journal offers the following:
"Some have questioned whether electromagnetic fields (EMF) generated by power lines, mobile phones, WLANs, RFID readers and other wireless devices may be harmful to human health. The World Health Organization's research, as well as many other scientific studies, have shown that EMF exposure below the limits recommended in internationally adopted guidelines has not revealed any known negative health effects. To ensure a uniform benchmark for compliance, EPCglobal recommends adhering to the human exposure limits for EMF as developed by the International Consortium on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and recommended by the WHO."
If there are established “exposure limits”, then there is no question that there is serious risk. Even our drinking water has established “contaminant levels” of arsenic, radon, bacteria, etc.
Read the ICNIRP report for yourself.
Note that RFID systems cover a wide array of frequencies depending on application – anywhere from ELF (extremely low frequencies) to microwave according to RFID journal.
RFID Journal offers the following:
"Some have questioned whether electromagnetic fields (EMF) generated by power lines, mobile phones, WLANs, RFID readers and other wireless devices may be harmful to human health. The World Health Organization's research, as well as many other scientific studies, have shown that EMF exposure below the limits recommended in internationally adopted guidelines has not revealed any known negative health effects. To ensure a uniform benchmark for compliance, EPCglobal recommends adhering to the human exposure limits for EMF as developed by the International Consortium on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and recommended by the WHO."
If there are established “exposure limits”, then there is no question that there is serious risk. Even our drinking water has established “contaminant levels” of arsenic, radon, bacteria, etc.
Read the ICNIRP report for yourself.
Note that RFID systems cover a wide array of frequencies depending on application – anywhere from ELF (extremely low frequencies) to microwave according to RFID journal.
Where's your chip?
Is there an RFID tag in your car key, your credit/debit card, your driver's license, your passport, your shopper's card, your cell phone, your employee ID card? Not all companies are accurately informing us of the contents of the products they give us.
JUST SAY NO
JUST SAY NO
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Information is Power
I was eating lunch in the office when it occurred to me that I needed to pick up some bread on the way home from work. I sent a quick email home so my wife might remind me to stop at the market. She responded with a simple message that she’d try to remind me, but I was much more intrigued with the sidebar on my email display. Thanks to email scan technology paired with the RFID tag in my shoulder, in less than a second, Google was able to tell me that I could find the lowest price for bread at Fry’s just 5 minutes away. I didn’t want to go to Fry’s because they don’t carry the brand I like best, but Google was able to connect with my Facebook account and offered me some very important facts. Google told me that 80 per cent of my friends enjoy the bread they sell at Fry’s. In fact, many of my local friends shop at that specific location. According to their statistical information, there’s a 75 per cent chance I will run into my good friend Joe if I get to the store between 4:30 and 5:00pm on Tuesdays.
I blink, and my privacy is gone
I received an envelope from Chase. It contained a new debit card and a slip of paper. The paper mentions that my new card features blink, which allows contact-less payment. Initially, I questioned the security of my finances. What would happen if I walked past the checkout counter at just the right time? Could my account be debited for someone else's purchase?
I searched the slip of paper for any documentation, but I found little more than a statement claiming that I will have Zero Liability for any unauthorized card transactions, made in certain fashion, when reported promptly.
Since this notification concluded that the security of my finances would be in jeopardy by activating this debit card, I searched the paperwork for any way to opt out of the program.
I found nothing, so I called the customer service number, and asked about blink. The gentleman I spoke with didn't seem to know anything about it. He kept asking for personal information so that he could access my account. I didn't see why he would need to access my account; I just had some questions about blink. He asked several times for my social security number, and every time he was denied. I let him know that the slip of paper says it works anywhere that PayPass works. He seemed to be able to find some information about PayPass, which he shared with me. When I asked what company he worked for, he told me Washington Mutual. I found it funny that Chase took control of WaMu, and then sent out new debit cards to WaMu customers with technology that WaMu representatives have never been introduced to - and using the WaMu customer service system to respond to inquiries.
He told me that one of the very important functions of PayPass is that it contains an RFID tag, and that it is virtually impossible to ever change your PIN. I could not understand the benefit of the latter, and he explained that if I ever lost my card, they would mail a new one to me without resetting the PIN. It seemed dangerous to me - if someone found my card and discovered my PIN, would they have permanent access to my account? I was certainly interested in this RFID tag, and thoughts of potential horrors associated with it flooded my mind. I asked how to opt out, since the letter also told me my current RFID-free card would expire much earlier than the date stamped on it. There was nothing he could do. Any card I would get would have the tag embedded behind the logo.
I chose not to activate the card. Instead, I'm going cash. Even if I store my paycheck at the bank, I will be withdrawing cash once weekly at maximum. I took the card and shredded it with scissors until I found the RFID tag. It was right under the blink logo.
I searched the slip of paper for any documentation, but I found little more than a statement claiming that I will have Zero Liability for any unauthorized card transactions, made in certain fashion, when reported promptly.
Since this notification concluded that the security of my finances would be in jeopardy by activating this debit card, I searched the paperwork for any way to opt out of the program.
I found nothing, so I called the customer service number, and asked about blink. The gentleman I spoke with didn't seem to know anything about it. He kept asking for personal information so that he could access my account. I didn't see why he would need to access my account; I just had some questions about blink. He asked several times for my social security number, and every time he was denied. I let him know that the slip of paper says it works anywhere that PayPass works. He seemed to be able to find some information about PayPass, which he shared with me. When I asked what company he worked for, he told me Washington Mutual. I found it funny that Chase took control of WaMu, and then sent out new debit cards to WaMu customers with technology that WaMu representatives have never been introduced to - and using the WaMu customer service system to respond to inquiries.
He told me that one of the very important functions of PayPass is that it contains an RFID tag, and that it is virtually impossible to ever change your PIN. I could not understand the benefit of the latter, and he explained that if I ever lost my card, they would mail a new one to me without resetting the PIN. It seemed dangerous to me - if someone found my card and discovered my PIN, would they have permanent access to my account? I was certainly interested in this RFID tag, and thoughts of potential horrors associated with it flooded my mind. I asked how to opt out, since the letter also told me my current RFID-free card would expire much earlier than the date stamped on it. There was nothing he could do. Any card I would get would have the tag embedded behind the logo.
I chose not to activate the card. Instead, I'm going cash. Even if I store my paycheck at the bank, I will be withdrawing cash once weekly at maximum. I took the card and shredded it with scissors until I found the RFID tag. It was right under the blink logo.
Why stop RFID?
RFID (Radio Frequency Identification tags) are microchips that gather and share information about their surroundings. They are read by a remote sensor that can obtain all kinds of personal information about you or the "product" they are attached to and then store it on a database. They are commonly used for practical reasons such as EZPass, contact-less payment, and inventory tracking, but are also used to track the location and verify the identities of human beings. This is advanced technology that could quickly spiral out of control and put your life in the hands of another.
There has already been research linking RFID chips with certain types of cancer in animals http://www.vetpathology.org/cgi/content/full/43/4/545 . Do you want to carry around—or even be injected with—another object that could cause harm to you and your family?
These are computer-based systems, and therefore their databases have the capability of being hacked into (and already have been in the past). Once your personal information is stored on them, anyone could access it. Your information could also be sold to advertising agencies, which would then use it to market specifically to you. Google already knows what you write to your friends. Do you want them to know exactly where you were last night, too? They might even contact you to find out why you didn’t go see that movie you said you would see. What’s to stop these companies from using this information to control you to do what they want?
Already, governments around the world have proposed their use in passports, driver’s licenses, and in the flesh of law enforcement agents and military forces. How long will it be before they propose to implant civilians with chips? Some employers will use RFID implantation as a requirement for employees. If the government had the power to monitor your every move, would you feel safe? Protected? Free? Or does this remind you of novels such as 1984—horror stories that, when we read them as teenagers, we shuddered with fear.
It is time for the people to become informed about these devices before they are used against us. Please, invite your friends to be part of the movement to ban RFID from personal identification systems.
Protect your identity, protect your privacy, stop RFID
There has already been research linking RFID chips with certain types of cancer in animals http://www.vetpathology.org/cgi/con
These are computer-based systems, and therefore their databases have the capability of being hacked into (and already have been in the past). Once your personal information is stored on them, anyone could access it. Your information could also be sold to advertising agencies, which would then use it to market specifically to you. Google already knows what you write to your friends. Do you want them to know exactly where you were last night, too? They might even contact you to find out why you didn’t go see that movie you said you would see. What’s to stop these companies from using this information to control you to do what they want?
Already, governments around the world have proposed their use in passports, driver’s licenses, and in the flesh of law enforcement agents and military forces. How long will it be before they propose to implant civilians with chips? Some employers will use RFID implantation as a requirement for employees. If the government had the power to monitor your every move, would you feel safe? Protected? Free? Or does this remind you of novels such as 1984—horror stories that, when we read them as teenagers, we shuddered with fear.
It is time for the people to become informed about these devices before they are used against us. Please, invite your friends to be part of the movement to ban RFID from personal identification systems.
Protect your identity, protect your privacy, stop RFID